Logistics Facility Planning & Improvement | Related Knowledge Menu

jp tw Email MAP___ By Logistics Technology Research Institute
Distribution Center Planning

7. Useful Life of Logistics Equipment and Comprehensive Simulation for Distribution Center Planning

This is a comprehensive explanatory document regarding facility investments and hub planning for distribution centers, including the useful life and lease estimation for automated pallet warehouses, comparison between in-house construction and renting, bank loan repayment simulations, and construction cost examples in Sagamihara City.

1. Depreciation Period (Statutory Useful Life) of Automated Pallet Warehouses

Because an automated warehouse combines elements such as "building," "racks (shelving)," "cranes (mechanical equipment)," and "control systems (software)," the useful life differs depending on the asset classification for tax purposes.

Asset Classification Main Targets Statutory Useful Life (Approx.) Remarks
Machinery and Equipment Stacker cranes, transport conveyors, storage/retrieval control units 10 Years Applied as "Logistics Machinery/Equipment" or "Warehouse Industry Equipment"
Tools, Furniture and Fixtures Steel racks (shelving), pallets, etc. 8 - 12 Years Depends on rack structure and fixation method
Software WMS / WCS (Warehouse Control System) 5 Years Intangible fixed asset (software for internal use)
Building Attachments Integrated automated warehouse building, fire prevention/electrical equipment 15 - 31 Years In the case of building-integrated automated warehouses (rack-built)
💡 Practical Point

In accounting practice, it is common to either lump the entire facility together as "Machinery and Equipment (10-year useful life)" or to proportionally divide and depreciate it into the "Rack part (12 years)" and the "Control part (5 to 10 years)."

2. Mechanism of Lease Transactions and Lease Rates

When you do not purchase equipment with your own funds or bank loans but instead use a finance lease, the monthly lease fee is composed of the following elements.

Monthly Lease Fee = (Property Price [CAPEX] + Interest + Fixed Asset Tax + Damage Insurance Premium) ÷ Lease Period (Number of Months)
Guideline for Lease Rates (Annual)

3. Lease Fee Simulation for a 200 Million Yen Scale PL Automated Warehouse

[Prerequisites]
Estimation Item Calculation Formula Amount (Excl. Tax)
Property Main Body Price — 200,000,000 Yen
Monthly Lease Fee 200 Million Yen × 0.95% 1,900,000 Yen / Month
Annual Lease Fee 1.90 Million Yen/month × 12 months 22,800,000 Yen / Year
Total Lease Fee for 10 Years 1.90 Million Yen/month × 120 months 228,000,000 Yen
(Recalculation: Total Interest, Tax, Insurance) Total 228 Million Yen - Main Body 200 Million Yen 28,000,000 Yen (+14% relative to main body)

* In addition to the above, daily manufacturer maintenance costs (OPEX: approx. 6 to 10 million yen annually) will be incurred separately.

4. Comparison Between Purchase (Self-Ownership/Straight-Line Method) and Lease

Comparison Item Purchase (10-Year Straight-Line Depreciation) 10-Year Finance Lease
Initial Cash Outflow 200 Million Yen (or execution of borrowing) 0 Yen (Only the first monthly fee)
1st Year Expensing (P/L) Depreciation Expense 20 Million Yen / Year Lease Fee 22.8 Million Yen / Year
Interest & Total Cost Bank borrowing interest only (Low total cost) Includes fees, taxes, and insurance (Total cost slightly higher)
Fixed Asset Tax & Payment Administration Requires in-house declaration, payment, and management Handled by the lease company (No administrative burden)
Ownership After Period Ends Self-ownership (Can be used for free from the 11th year onwards) Return or Re-lease (Continue at e.g., 1/10 of the annual amount)

5. Comparison: Manual Work (Forklift) vs PL Automated Warehouse

Comparison Item Floor Stacking / Pallet Racks + Lift PL Automated Warehouse (Pallet AS/RS)
Main Overview Install racks in existing warehouse, lift operators travel to handle cargo Stacker cranes travel automatically in high-rise 3D racks
Initial Investment (CAPEX) Low (Approx. 10 - 20 Million Yen) High (Approx. 200 Million Yen)
Required Tsubo Area (Assuming 1,000 PL) Approx. 350 - 500 Tsubo Approx. 100 - 150 Tsubo (Max 70% area reduction)
Effective Use of Ceiling Height Low (Up to about 5-6m) Extremely High (Utilizes space of 10-20m or more)
Required Labor Costs (Workers) High (3-5 resident lift operators) Extremely Low (About 1 person for input)

Judgment Criteria for Operational Method

[Warehouses that should choose Floor Stacking / Pallet Rack operation]


[Warehouses that should choose a PL Automated Warehouse (200 Million Yen scale)]

6. Offset Simulation for Monthly Cost (2.5 Million Yen/Month) of PL Automated Warehouse

Monthly Offset Amount (2.5M Yen) = Rent Reduction Amount + Labor Saving Amount + Others (Reduction in overtime/accidents)
3 Achievement Scenarios

Pattern A: [Balanced Type] Standard suburban warehouse (Unit price 6,000 yen/tsubo)

・Storage Efficiency Improvement: 250 tsubo reduction × 6,000 yen = 1.50 Million Yen / Month
・Labor Saving Effect: Reduction of 3 lift operators = 1.20 Million Yen / Month
・[Total Effect] 2.70 Million Yen / Month (Monthly Balance: +200,000 Yen/Month Surplus)

Pattern B: [Location-focused Type] High-rent warehouse in urban suburbs (Unit price 10,000 yen/tsubo)

・Storage Efficiency Improvement: 200 tsubo reduction × 10,000 yen = 2.00 Million Yen / Month
・Labor Saving Effect: Reduction of 1.5 lift operators = 600,000 Yen / Month
・[Total Effect] 2.60 Million Yen / Month (Monthly Balance: +100,000 Yen/Month Surplus)

Pattern C: [Labor Shortage Specialized Type] Warehouse with high dispatch ratio

・Storage Efficiency Improvement: 150 tsubo reduction × 5,000 yen = 750,000 Yen / Month
・Labor Saving Effect: Reduction of 4 lift operators = 1.80 Million Yen / Month
・Mis-shipment / Accident Reduction: 100,000 Yen / Month
・[Total Effect] 2.65 Million Yen / Month (Monthly Balance: +150,000 Yen/Month Surplus)

7. Construction Cost Example in Sagamihara City (Site 3,000 tsubo, Single-story 1,800 tsubo)

Item [Standard / Low-cost Specifications] [High-spec / Prime Location Specifications]
Land Purchase Cost (3,000 tsubo) 1.20 billion yen (400k yen/tsubo) 1.80 billion yen (600k yen/tsubo)
Building Main Body Construction Cost (1,800 tsubo) 1.17 billion yen (650k yen/tsubo) 1.53 billion yen (850k yen/tsubo)
Exterior and Civil Engineering Construction Cost 0.08 billion yen 0.12 billion yen
Design, Application, and Incidental Costs 0.05 billion yen 0.08 billion yen
[Total Cost (excluding tax)] 2.50 billion yen 3.53 billion yen

8. 10-Year TCO Comparison: In-house Construction (3 Billion Yen) vs. Lease (1,800 Tsubo)

Cost Item ① In-house Construction (Ownership) ② Leased Property (10-year use) Remarks / Supplementary Info
Initial Investment (CAPEX) 3.00 Billion Yen 0.12 Billion Yen ① Land 1.5B + Building 1.5B / ② Deposit + Cat. C works
Monthly Fixed Payments (10-year cumulative) 0 Yen (Excluding loan repayment) 1.08 Billion Yen Rent + CAM (9 million yen/month × 120 months)
[Total Expenditure over 10 years] 3.43 Billion Yen 1.26 Billion Yen Cumulative pure cash out
Retained Residual Value after 10 years ▲ 2.20 Billion Yen (Asset) 0 Yen Land 1.5B + Building remaining depreciation approx. 0.7B
[Actual Retention Cost over 10 years] 1.23 Billion Yen 1.26 Billion Yen Total expenditure - Asset value after 10 years (Roughly equal at year 10)

9. Bank Financing (3 Billion Yen, 1.5%, 20-year Repayment) Simulation

Repayment Conditions & Estimates
Cash Outflow / Cost Item ① In-house Construction (3 Billion loan, 20-year repayment) ② Leased Property (10-year use) Difference / Remarks
[Total Cash Out over 10 years] 2.168 Billion Yen 1.260 Billion Yen ① is +0.908 Billion Yen more
Net Asset Impact after 10 years ▲ 0.118 Billion Yen 0 Yen Assets 1.5B - Liabilities 1.618B
[Actual Burden Amount over 10 years] 2.286 Billion Yen 1.260 Billion Yen Actual burden including net asset movements
💡 Conclusion and Selection Guidelines

・ Focus on Capital Efficiency & Expansion Speed: It is advantageous to choose "Leasing," where the initial cash out is over 900 million yen less, and invest those funds in material handling equipment or business expansion.

・ Focus on Ultra-long-term Fixed Cost Reduction & Asset Formation: "In-house Construction (Financing)" holds a long-term advantage, as the annual fixed costs plummet to about 35 million yen (taxes and maintenance only) after the loan is paid off (from the 21st year onwards).

← Back to Menu List