Logistics Facility Planning & Improvement | Related Knowledge Menu

jp tw Email MAP___ By Logistics Technology Research Institute
Domestic Logistics Trend Data

3-2. Logistics Facility Planning and Logistics Park Selection Based on Freight Transport Volume Analysis

In order for a company to build a winning supply chain and formulate lean logistics facility planning, it is essential to accurately grasp the macro trends of freight transport and the flow of goods by region (intra-regional flow and inter-regional flow).

Simply choosing "the location closest to demand" or "land with cheap rent" will lead to fatal challenges after operations begin, such as bloated freight transport costs, trucks waiting to dock, and difficulties securing drivers due to the 2024 problem.

This article provides a multifaceted analysis of changes in domestic freight transport volume over the past 20 years, the balance between intra-regional flow and inter-regional flow for each regional block, and the hub functions played by major logistics parks nationwide, explaining practical guidelines for translating this into highly accurate logistics facility planning.

Graph memo of freight transport volume

1. Freight Transport Trends over the Past 20 Years and Background

The first step to making your company's logistics facility planning successful is to correctly discern the changes in the macro environment surrounding freight transport across Japan as a whole.

1-1. Trends in Total Logistics Costs (Ratio of Logistics Costs to Sales / Macro Costs)

Period of Slump and Stability (2000s to Mid-2010s)

Due to price competition among transport operators and thorough logistics efficiency improvements by companies, the ratio of logistics costs to sales remained stable at a low level of under 5% to around 5% for a long time.

Period of Long-term Increase (2016 Onwards)

Against the backdrop of freight rate hikes accompanying the severe shortage of truck drivers, soaring fuel prices, and rising labor costs, the increase in freight transport costs began in earnest.

Fixation at a High Level (2021 to Present)

In fiscal 2021, it recorded 5.70%, the highest ratio in the past 20 years. In recent years, it has remained at a high level of 5.36% to 5.44%, and the perceived burden of logistics costs has reached an all-time high due to responses to the "2024 problem" and high prices.

1-2. Structural Changes in Logistics Volume (Domestic Freight Transport Volume)

Gradual Decrease in Total Weight (Ton basis)

Due to the relocation of manufacturing overseas, the lightening of products, and the promotion of joint delivery, the total domestic freight transport weight has continued a gradual decrease/flat trend from the 5 billion-ton scale in the early 2000s to the low 4 billion-ton range.

Divergence between BtoB (Business-to-Business) and BtoC (EC/Courier)

While mass transport in BtoB is sluggish, the number of courier parcels handled has increased explosively due to the expansion of EC. Even if the total weight does not increase, a structural change is progressing where "small-lot, high-frequency" deliveries are intensifying, driving up the workload on-site and the frequency of transport.

2. Flow Structure by 10 Regional Blocks Nationwide (Intra-Regional Flow vs. Inter-Regional Flow)

When determining the location area of a hub in logistics facility planning, the most important indicator is the ratio of "intra-regional flow (completed within the block)" and "inter-regional flow (transport crossing over to other blocks)" from the shipping origin.

Logistics volume and share by 10 regional blocks nationwide

The Fact that Intra-Regional Flow Accounts for About 70-80%

The vast majority (about 70-80%) of freight transport shipped from each regional block is a flow that completes within the same block (intra-regional flow). The foundation is designing a delivery network geared towards local production for local consumption and community-based delivery.

Inter-Regional Flow is Mainly Directed to Adjacent Regions and Metropolitan Areas

The remaining roughly 20-30% (inter-regional flow) is mainly comprised of "transport to adjacent regional blocks" and "concentrated transport to large metropolitan areas such as Kanto, Chubu, and Kinki."

Structural Characteristics Deciphered from Mapping Data and Insights for Facility Planning

1. Extreme Concentration in the Three Major Metropolitan Areas (56.6%)
Just the three blocks of Kanto (27.8%), Chubu (16.1%), and Kinki (12.7%) account for the majority (56.6%) of the total freight transport volume in Japan. When establishing a wide-area hub center, selecting a logistics park with excellent accessibility to these metropolitan areas is mandatory.

2. High "Intra-Regional Completion Rate" (National Average 77.1%)
Of the total freight transport volume nationwide, about 77.1% is completed within the same block (intra-regional flow), and transport crossing regional blocks (inter-regional flow) accounts for only about 22.9% of the total. Particularly in Kanto and Kyushu, the ratio of intra-regional flow is extremely high, and strengthening the last-mile network within the region is the crux of logistics facility planning.

3. The Top Prefecture is "Aichi Prefecture"
By regional block, Kanto is first, but looking at single prefectures, Aichi Prefecture, a major agglomeration of manufacturing, boasts the highest freight transport volume in the country. This demonstrates the importance of the Chubu region as the point of contact between production logistics and sales logistics.

3. Major Logistics Parks and Consolidation Hubs Nationwide

Major logistics parks (distribution business parks) nationwide are developed in prime locations directly connected to expressway interchanges (ICs), major arterial roads, ports, and airports, with the aim of alleviating traffic congestion in urban areas and consolidating and streamlining freight transport.

1. Tokyo Metropolitan Area (Kanto Area)

In the Tokyo metropolitan area, which possesses a massive consumption area and international infrastructure, logistics parks along the bay area and the inland loop lines (Gaikan Expressway, Ken-O Expressway) form the core of intra-regional flow and inter-regional flow.

2. Chubu Region (Chukyo Area)

A junction for Japan's freight transport where the automotive industry is concentrated and the Tomei, Meishin, Chuo, and Shin-Tomei expressways converge.

3. Kinki Region (Kansai Area)

A network of the Meishin, Chugoku Expressway, Hanshin Expressway, Kinki Expressway, and Shin-Meishin runs like a web, covering inter-regional flow to all of Western Japan.

4. Kyushu, Chugoku, Shikoku, Hokkaido, Tohoku Areas

In regional blocks, wide-area logistics parks are formed at the crossroads (junctions) of major expressways or near interchanges of large metropolitan areas.

4. The 3 Roles Played by Logistics Parks in Logistics Facility Planning

When a company advances a sophisticated logistics facility planning, advancing into and locating within a logistics park (distribution business park) systematically developed by the government or development corporations, rather than independently acquiring private land and building a hub, presents extremely large structural and strategic advantages. A logistics park is not merely a collection of warehouses; it primarily serves the following three important roles as an indispensable social infrastructure smoothly connecting the regional economy with wide-area freight transport networks.